Storm

Storm v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20243:23-cv-00889California226 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DIMITRI Z. STORM, Case No. 23-cv-00889-AMO (PR) Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Vv. WITH PREJUDICE GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., ll Defendants. On November 14, 2023, the Court issued an order dismissing Plaintiff Dimitri Z. Storm’s || complaint with leave to amend. Dkt. 14. The Court informed Storm that failure to timely file an || amended complaint within twenty-eight days would result in the dismissal of his action with || prejudice. See id. Twenty-eight days have passed, and Storm has not filed an amended complaint a || or communicated with the Court in any manner. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 989, 992 (9th Cir. 1999) (affirming dismissal of 19 || action with prejudice when plaintiff failed to amend complaint after receiving leave to do so, 20 || because expeditious resolution of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.