H.

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 E. H. and C.S., Case No. 23-cv-04784-WHO

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 34 10 META PLATFORMS, INC., Defendant. 11

12 This case is one of many pending in this District and around the country against defendant 13 Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Meta”) over the use of its “pixel” tracking technology. According to 14 plaintiffs here and in the other cases, Meta encourages operators of websites and applications 15 (“apps”) to install its pixel technology and then, unbeknownst to users of those websites and apps 16 (here Cerebral, an online mental telehealth provider, Compl. ¶ 36), the users’ sensitive healthcare 17 information is transmitted to Meta. Here, named plaintiffs E.H. and C.S. are residents of 18 Oklahoma and Massachusetts respectively and do not have Facebook accounts. Yet they allege 19 their data was intercepted and transmitted to Meta. See Compl. ¶¶ 7, 11, 12. 20 Meta acknowledges my prior Orders in In Re Meta Healthcare Pixel Litigation: while 21 preserving its…