Sienze

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 VICTOR M. SIENZE, et al., Case No. 19-cv-04279-JSW

10 Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

11 v. REVERSE DECISIONS AND

ENTERING JUDGMENT

12 COUNTY OF LAKE, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 144, 146 Defendants. 13

14 15 Pursuant to this Court’s order dated January 9, 2024, granting Defendant Moore’s motion 16 for summary judgment, the parties have submitted a joint case management statement indicating 17 that the case is effectively over and judgment should be entered. (Dkt. No. 144, Joint Statement at 18 3:13-14.) The Court agrees and shall enter judgment separately. 19 However, it appears that Victor Sienze. Sr., the first-named plaintiff in this case and the 20 father of the deceased, disagrees with Dan Moseley, his former counsel’s opinion as well as 21 counsel’s decision to file a statement of non-opposition to the motion for summary judgment. 22 (Dkt. No. 139.) The Court has reviewed in detail all of Mr. Sienze’s submissions and arguments. 23 (Dkt. Nos. 141, 142, 146, 147.) …