Sienze

Sienze v. Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20244:19-cv-04279California638 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 VICTOR M. SIENZE, et al., Case No. 19-cv-04279-JSW

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. REVERSE DECISIONS AND

ENTERING JUDGMENT

COUNTY OF LAKE, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 144, 146 Defendants.

14 Pursuant to this Court’s order dated January 9, 2024, granting Defendant Moore’s motion for summary judgment, the parties have submitted a joint case management statement indicating that the case is effectively over and judgment should be entered. (Dkt. No. 144, Joint Statement at 3:13-14.) The Court agrees and shall enter judgment separately. However, it appears that Victor Sienze. Sr., the first-named plaintiff in this case and the father of the deceased, disagrees with Dan Moseley, his former counsel’s opinion as well as counsel’s decision to file a statement of non-opposition to the motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 139.) The Court has reviewed in detail all of Mr. Sienze’s submissions and arguments. (Dkt. Nos. 141, 142, 146, 147.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.