Craven

Craven v. Garcia

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20245:23-cv-01822California1,080 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6

KALVIN NEIL CRAVEN,

7 Case No. 23-cv-01822-AMO (PR) Plaintiff, 8 ORDER DISMISSING FABRICATED- v. EVIDENCE CLAIM; AND SETTING 9 BRIEFING SCHEDULE

JOSE GARCIA,

10 Defendant. 11

12 On November 15, 2023, the Court dismissed Plaintiff Kalvin Neil Craven’s fabricated- 13 evidence claim with leave to amend to provide Craven one final opportunity to cure the 14 deficiencies indicated in the Court’s November 15, 2023 Order “within twenty-eight (28) days.” 15 Dkt. 11 at 3-4. The Court warned Craven that the failure to file a proper amended complaint 16 within the designated time will result in the following: “(1) the dismissal of Craven’s fabricated- 17 evidence claim; (2) the original complaint (Dkt. 1) remaining the operative complaint; and (3) this 18 action proceeding in accordance with th[e] [November 15, 2023] Order.” Id. at 4. 19 The twenty-eight days provided by the Court have passed, and Craven has neither…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.