Ramirez

RM White LLC v. Ramirez

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20245:24-cv-00485California1,543 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RM WHITE LLC, Case No. 24-cv-00485-SVK

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

9 v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND FOR

10 ELISEO RAMIREZ, REASSIGNMENT OF CASE

TO A DISTRICT JUDGE

11 Defendant.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

12 TO REMAND ACTION 13 Re: Dkt. No. 2

14 Plaintiff RM White LLC commenced this action against pro se Defendant Eliseo Ramirez 15 in the Superior Court of California for the County of Santa Clara. Defendant subsequently 16 removed this action to this Court. Before the Court is Defendant’s application to proceed in forma 17 pauperis. Dkt. 2 (the “Application”). Neither Party has consented to the jurisdiction of a 18 magistrate judge. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS the Application. Because the Court 19 grants the Application, it screens Plaintiff’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e). See Dkt. 20 1 at ECF Pages 5-10 (the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.