Miller v. Nature's Path Foods, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20244:23-cv-05711California549 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 IAN MILLER, Case No. 23-cv-05711-JST

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING

9 v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT

10 NATURE’S PATH FOODS, INC., CONFERENCE 11 Defendant. Re: ECF No. 26

12 13 Now before the Court is Defendant’s administrative motion to continue the February 20, 14 2024 case management conference. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant the motion. 15 First, Defendant’s new counsel was engaged less than a month ago. Regardless of what 16 may have transpired before that time or what agreements may have been reached with prior 17 counsel, ordinary professional courtesy would suggest that—except in an emergency—a modest 18 extension of the existing deadlines would be appropriate to allow new counsel to get up to speed. 19 There is nothing emergent about Plaintiff’s claims, which “seek redress for [Defendant’s] 20 unlawful and deceptive practices in labeling and marketing of Defendant’s breakfast and snack…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.