Hightower

Hightower v. Celestron Acquisition, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20245:20-cv-03639California2,040 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 IN RE TELESCOPES ANTITRUST Case No. 20-cv-03639-EJD (VKD) LITIGATION Case No. 20-cv-03642-EJD (VKD) 9

Re: Case No. 20-cv-3639 10 Dkt. Nos. 304, 305, 321

11 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION

12 OF DOCUMENTS WITHHELD AS

PRIVILEGED;

13 GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTION TO SEAL

14

15 16 Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs (“IPPs”) and Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs (“DPPs”) 17 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) move to compel the production of certain documents that Defendants 18 claim are protected from disclosure. See Dkt. No. 305.1 Specifically, Plaintiffs argue that 19 Defendants should be required to produce (1) communications that Plaintiffs contend were shared 20 with third parties and (2) attachments to attorney-client communications that Plaintiffs contend are 21 not privileged. Id. at 2. The Court finds…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.