Kwon
Casa Nido Partnership v. Kwon
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
I. BACKGROUND
15 Plaintiff Casa Nido moves for leave to file a second motion for summary judgment, this 16 time against the five remaining Defendants: Catherine O’Hanks, Sandra Kate Vernell, Earl Ray 17 Anderson, Lynne Marie Garibotti, and the Estate of Jae Kwon. Docket No. 203 at 2 (“Motion”). 18 The first motion for summary judgment was against Sentry Insurance Company. The Court issued 19 an Order granting in part and denying in part the first summary judgment motion against Sentry 20 Insurance Company. Docket No. 196. The Order only addressed the issue of insurance contract 21 liability. Id. 22 In contrast, the instant second motion for summary judgment against the five individual 23 Defendants concerns the following state statutory and common law claims: 24 1. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, 25 and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”) (42 U.S.C. §9607(a)) 2. Carpenter-Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Act (“HSAA”) 26 (Cal. Health & Safety Code) 3. Innocent Landowner (Cal. Health & Safety Code ) 27 4. Water Pollution (Porter-Cologne Act) (Cal. Water Code §§ 6. Per Se Nuisance (Cal. Civ. Code…