Rothschild
Rothschild v. The Pacific Companies
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MAYER AMSCHEL ROTHSCHILD, Case No. 23-cv-01721-LJC
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO ADD
v. ADDITIONAL DEFENDANT;
DIRECTING UNITED STATES
THE PACIFIC COMPANIES, MARHAL TO EFFECTUATE SERVICE Defendant.
12 The Court previously issued two orders screening pro se Plaintiff Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s1 complaints pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and provided him with opportunities to fix deficiencies therein. ECF Nos. 16, 23. The current operative complaint in this action is the Third Amended Complaint (TAC) filed on September 29, 2023. ECF No. 25. On November 30, 2023, Mr. Rothschild filed a Motion to Add Additional Defendant. ECF No. 28. Mr. Rothschild has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction. ECF No. 9. For the reasons detailed below, the Court DENIES the Motion to Add Additional Defendant, but orders the United States Marshal to effectuate service on Defendant The Pacific Companies. I. BACKGROUND …