Olivalemus

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JOSE GABRIEL OLIVALEMUS, Case No. 23-cv-04963-HSG

8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE

TO AMEND; DENYING DKT. NOS. 10,

9 v. 13; ADDRESSING DKT. NO. 14

10 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SHERIFF, et Re: Dkt. Nos. 10, 13, 14 al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiff has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His complaint (Dkt. No. 1) 14 is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Plaintiff has been granted leave to 15 proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. This order also addresses the requests made in Dkt. 16 Nos. 10, 13; and Dkt. No. 14. 17 DISCUSSION 18 A. Standard of Review 19 A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks 20 redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. 21 § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims 22 that are frivolous, malicious,…