Astral IP Enterprise LTD v. Care20 Fertility Calendar Cycle Tracker

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20243:23-cv-03835California4,452 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ASTRAL IP ENTERPRISE LTD., Case No. 23-cv-03835-EMC

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

9 v. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

10 CARE20 FERTILITY CALENDAR CYCLE TRACKER, Docket No. 22 11 Defendant. 12 13 14 Plaintiff Astral IP Enterprise Ltd. has filed suit against Defendant Care20 Fertility 15 Calendar Cycle Tracker. Astral has asserted claims for federal trademark infringement, federal 16 and state law unfair competition, and federal copyright infringement. Currently pending before 17 the Court is Astral’s motion for default judgment. A hearing was held on the motion on February 18 15, 2024. Although Care20 was given notice of the hearing (through email at least), it did not 19 make an appearance. Having considered the papers submitted (including the supplemental 20 briefing ordered by the Court) and the oral argument of Astral, the Court hereby GRANTS the 21 motion for default judgment. 22 I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 23 The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.