Cruz

Cruz v. Calderon

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20244:23-cv-05653California4,349 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GUILLERMO TRUJILLO CRUZ, Case No. 23-cv-05653-HSG

8 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA

9 v. PAUPERIS SHOULD NOT BE DENIED;

DENYING AS MOOT REQUEST TO

10 CALDERON, et al., RETURN COMPLAINT AND “MOTION OF NOTIFICATION” 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 8, 10, 12 12

13 14 Plaintiff, an inmate at Pelican Bay State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant 15 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has requested that the Court return his complaint to him so that he may 16 comply with the electronic filing requirement set forth in N.D. Cal. General Order 76, Dkt. No. 8; 17 requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt. No. 10; and filed a “motion of notification that 18 civil rights action 1983 was electronically mail,” Dkt. No. 12. For the reasons set forth below, the 19 Court DENIES as moot Plaintiff’s request that his complaint be returned, Dkt. No. 8, and his 20 motion of notification, Dkt. No. 12; and orders Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.