Sevesind

Sevesind v. The Walt Disney Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20243:23-cv-02500California1,727 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AMIN JAMES, et al., Case No. 23-cv-02500-EMC (EMC)

8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S 9 v. MOTION TO CERTIFY FOR

INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL

10 THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, WITHOUT PREJUDICE

11 Defendant. Docket No. 35 12

13 14 Plaintiffs Amin James and David Sevesind (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) have filed a class 15 action against Defendant The Walt Disney Company (“Disney”). Plaintiffs assert that their 16 privacy rights, as protected by Pennsylvania and California statutory law, have been violated 17 because there is Oracle software embedded in Disney’s ESPN.com website that captures and 18 collects data as individuals use the website. Previously, the Court denied in part Disney’s motion 19 to dismiss for lack of standing and failure to state a claim for relief. See Docket No. 30 (order). 20 Disney now asks that the Court certify its order for interlocutory appeal, largely because of the 21 issue of standing. See Not. at 2. Having considered the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.