Sevesind
Sevesind v. The Walt Disney Company
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AMIN JAMES, et al., Case No. 23-cv-02500-EMC (EMC)
8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S 9 v. MOTION TO CERTIFY FOR
INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL
10 THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, WITHOUT PREJUDICE
11 Defendant. Docket No. 35 12
13 14 Plaintiffs Amin James and David Sevesind (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) have filed a class 15 action against Defendant The Walt Disney Company (“Disney”). Plaintiffs assert that their 16 privacy rights, as protected by Pennsylvania and California statutory law, have been violated 17 because there is Oracle software embedded in Disney’s ESPN.com website that captures and 18 collects data as individuals use the website. Previously, the Court denied in part Disney’s motion 19 to dismiss for lack of standing and failure to state a claim for relief. See Docket No. 30 (order). 20 Disney now asks that the Court certify its order for interlocutory appeal, largely because of the 21 issue of standing. See Not. at 2. Having considered the…