San

San v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20245:23-cv-04054California2,604 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 P.S., Case No. 23-cv-04054-SVK

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER ON

9 v. CROSS-MOTIONS

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

10 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Re: Dkt. Nos. 10, 12 11 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff P.S. appeals from the final decision of Defendant Commissioner of Social 13 Security, which denied her applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security 14 income. The Parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. See Dkts. 7-8. For 15 the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (the 16 “Motion” at Dkt. 10) and GRANTS Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment (the 17 “Cross-Motion” or “Opposition” at Dkt. 12). 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 In April 2021 and March 2022, respectively, Plaintiff filed applications for Title II 20 disability insurance benefits and Title XVI supplemental security income, alleging a disability 21 onset date of February 28, 2020. See AR 17.1 Defendant denied Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.