Weisner

Weisner v. Salinas

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20243:22-cv-05382California3,170 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 FRANKIE J. WEISNER, BE9270, Case No. 22-cv-05382-CRB (PR)

6 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

7 v. MOTION TO DISMISS

8 L. SALINAS, et al., (ECF Nos. 46, 49, 50, 58 & 60) 9 Defendant(s).

10 I. 11 Plaintiff, a state prisoner currently incarcerated at Kern Valley State Prison (KVSP), filed a 12 pro se First Amended Complaint (FAC) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that, while he was 13 incarcerated at the Correctional Training Facility (CTF), correctional case records analyst L. 14 Salinas unlawfully retaliated against him for challenging via inmate appeals her calculation of his 15 sentence by having two Investigative Services Unit (ISU) officers threaten plaintiff and by filing a 16 false Rules Violation Report (RVR) against plaintiff for harassing Salinas. Plaintiff also alleges 17 that the CTF officials who helped process Salinas’ RVR – H. Andrade, P. McDonald, S. Handley, 18 S. Balli,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.