River Supply, Incorporated v. Oracle America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20243:23-cv-02981California7,887 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 RIVER SUPPLY, INC., Case No. 3:23-cv-02981-LB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS IN PART AND DENYING

13 v. MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART

14 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., NETSUITE, Re: ECF No. 65 INC., and SPS COMMERCE, INC., 15 Defendants. 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 This case involves a commercial contract dispute. Plaintiff River Supply sells architectural- 19 construction materials. Defendant Oracle America makes database and enterprise software products, 20 and it sells its subscription services through its subsidiary, defendant NetSuite. 21 River Supply bought Oracle products and alleges that Oracle breached its contractual 22 commitments and misrepresented the capabilities of its software, its experience installing its system, 23 and its ability to provide a system that could work as promised.1 Oracle moved to dismiss the 24 complaint on the grounds that the economic-loss doctrine…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.