Wimbley

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 8 D.W.,1 Case No. 23-cv-06189-PHK 9 Plaintiff,

10 v. ORDER RE: MANDATORY

SCREENING OF COMPLAINT

11 MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. Social Security Administration,2 § 1915(e)(2)(B) 12 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 1 13 14 Plaintiff D.W. (“Plaintiff”) brings this action under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 15 § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security 16 Administration, Defendant Martin O’Malley (“Commissioner”), denying Plaintiff’s applications 17 for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. [Dkt. 1]. The Court 18 previously granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), in accordance with 19 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). [Dkt. 9]. The Court now analyzes Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to the 20 requirements of § 1915(e)(2)(B). 21 Any complaint filed pursuant to the IFP provisions of § 1915(a) is subject to…