Banga

Banga v. Kanios

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20243:16-cv-04270California363 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

NAVJEET SINGH BANGA,

10 Case No. 16-cv-04270-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 12 DENYING IN PART MOTION TO CHRIS GUS KANIOS, et al., QUASH 13 Defendants. 14

15 Plaintiff Navjeet Banga moves to quash Defendants’ subpoena requesting he (1) testify at 16 trial and (2) produce various categories of documents. First, Banga contends it would be unduly 17 burdensome to have to testify at trial given he is proceeding pro se in this matter. Banga, however, 18 will be present throughout the upcoming bench trial and has previously represented he intends to 19 testify during his own case-in-chief. In the event Defendants request he testify at trial, Banga’s 20 motion to quash Defendants’ subpoena is denied.1 Moreover, Banga’s pro se status does not 21 excuse him from otherwise following all applicable court rules. 22 Second, Banga moves to quash Defendants’ subpoena to the extent it requests that he 23 produce a number of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.