Glaude

Glaude v. Deutsche Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20243:23-cv-05429California3,305 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

DONALD GLAUDE,

10 Case No. 23-cv-05429-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 12 DISMISS, DENYING MOTION FOR DEUTSCHE BANK, et al., PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, AND 13 DENYING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT Defendants. ON THE PLEADINGS 14

15 16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 Defendant Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“Deutsche Bank”) moves to dismiss 18 Plaintiff Donald Glaude’s claims against it in this newest round of litigation concerning the 19 ownership of, and foreclosure on, 8096 Juniper Avenue, Newark, California (“the Property”). 20 Deutsche Bank argues Glaude’s claims are barred by the doctrine of res judicata or, in the 21 alternative, should be stayed or dismissed under the Colorado River and/or Rooker-Feldman 22 doctrines.1 Deutsche Bank’s motion to dismiss is granted, and Glaude’s motions for a preliminary 23 injunction and for judgment on the pleadings are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.