GS Holistic, LLC v. Smoke and Vape
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GS HOLISTIC, LLC, Case No. 23-cv-00753-AMO (LJC)
8 Plaintiff,
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
9 v. RE: MOTION FOR DEFAULT
JUDGMENT
10 GOKUL PUDASAINI, et al., Re: ECF No. 21 Defendants. 11
12 13 Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC (GS Holistic) filed this action for alleged trademark 14 infringement under 15 U.S.C. § 1114 and false designation of origin and unfair competition under 15 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) against Defendants Gokul Pudasaini d/b/a Smoke and Vape (Smoke and 16 Vape) and Gokul Pudasaini. ECF No. 14 (First Amended Complaint, or FAC) ¶¶ 53–61, 62–70. 17 Defendants failed to appear, and the Clerk of the Court entered default against each of them. ECF 18 No. 21. GS Holistic subsequently filed a Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 21), which was 19 referred to the undersigned for a report and recommendation. ECF No. 26. Pursuant to Civil 20 Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds this matter suitable for determination without oral argument. 21 Upon consideration of the…