Saechao

Saechao v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20244:19-cv-03711-DMRCalifornia1,609 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MOUNG Y. S., Case No. 19-cv-03711-DMR

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTION FOR

9 v. ATTORNEYS' FEES

10 MARTIN O’MALLEY, Re: Dkt. No. 33 11 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Moung Y. S. filed a motion for summary judgment seeking to reverse the 13 Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s administrative decision to deny her 14 application for benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. On September 30, 15 2021, the court granted Plaintiff’s motion in part and remanded the case for further proceedings. 16 Following remand, an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found that Plaintiff is disabled and 17 entitled to past-due disability benefits. Plaintiff’s counsel Geri N. Kahn now moves for an award 18 of attorneys’ fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). [Docket No. 33.] This matter is suitable for 19 resolution without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the motion is granted. 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.

Saechao · N.D. California · 2024 | Caselegis