Tavantzis
Tavantzis v. American Airlines, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 ANA MARIA MARCELA TAVANTZIS, et Case No. 23-cv-05607-BLF al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY 9 DISCOVERY v. 10 [Re: ECF No. 36]
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.,
11 Defendant. 12 13 Before the Court is Defendant American Airlines, Inc.’s motion to stay discovery pending 14 the resolution of its motion to dismiss. ECF No. 36 (“Mot.”). Plaintiffs Ana Maria Marcela 15 Tavantzis and Jesus Plasencia oppose the motion. ECF No. 39 (“Opp.”). American Airlines filed 16 a reply in support of its motion. ECF No. 42 (“Reply”). The Court finds this motion suitable for 17 disposition without oral argument and VACATES the hearing set for May 9, 2024. Civ. L.R. 7- 18 1(b). 19 For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES American Airlines’ motion. 20 I. LEGAL STANDARD 21 “The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not provide for automatic or blanket stays of 22 discovery when a potentially dispositive…