Shin

Shin v. ICON Foundation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20243:20-cv-07363California2,089 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARK SHIN, Case No. 20-cv-07363-WHO

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER RESOLVING DISCOVERY

9 v. AND CASE MANAGEMENT

SCHEDULE DISPUTES AND

10 ICON FOUNDATION, RECONSIDERATION MOTION 11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 147, 151, 155, 157

12

13 14 Before the court are several disputes that plaintiff Mark Shin has raised in the past month. 15 First, he seeks leave to file a motion for reconsideration of my order appointing a receiver. 16 Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration (“Reconsideration Motion”) [Dkt. No. 147]; 17 see also Order on Motion to Appoint Receiver [Dkt. No. 129]. Next, he seeks to extend the 18 discovery period by “at least 90-days.” He cites the recent resolution of a state court criminal case 19 in his favor, his counsel’s (relatively) recent appearance, the factual and procedural complexity of 20 the case, and numerosity of claims as “good cause” for this extension. Motion to Revise Case 21 Management Schedule (“CMS…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.