Seeno

Seeno v. Discovery Builders, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20245:23-cv-04072California3,394 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 ALBERT D. SEENO, et al., Case No. 5:23-cv-04072-EJD

9 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS

10 v.

11 DISCOVERY BUILDERS, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 21 Defendants. 12

13 Plaintiffs Albert D. Seeno, Jr. (“Seeno”) and Albert D. Seeno Construction Co. (“Seeno 14 Construction”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring claims for trademark infringement and false 15 designation of origin under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051, et seq., against Defendants 16 Discovery Builders, Inc., (“Discovery Builders”), Discovery Realty, Inc. (“Discovery Realty”), and 17 Seeno Homes, Inc. (“Seeno Homes”) (collectively, “Defendants”). Compl., ECF No. 1. 18 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Mot. to Dismiss (“Mot.”), ECF No. 21. 19 Plaintiffs filed an opposition, and Defendants filed a reply. Pls.’ Opp’n to Mot. (“Opp’n”), ECF 20 No. 28; Defs.’ Reply in Supp. of Mot. (“Reply”), ECF No. 30. The Court heard oral arguments 21 from the Parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.