Longboy

Longboy v. Pinnacle Property Management Services, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20243:23-cv-01248California7,257 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

21 A. Factual Background1 22 Plaintiff Devin Michael Longboy worked for Pinnacle as an assistant property manager 23 from June 2020 to January 2022. First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (ECF 15) ¶ 15. On July 1, 24 25 1 When evaluating a motion to compel arbitration, courts apply a standard similar to a motion for 26 summary judgment, construing all facts and reasonable inferences in a light most favorable to the non-moving party. See Lomeli v. Midland Funding, LLC, No. 19-CV-01141-LHK, 2019 WL 27 4695279, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 26, 2019) (citing Concat LP v. Unilever, PLC, 350 F. Supp. 2d 1 2020, Longboy signed an “issue resolutions agreement” (“Agreement”) with Pinnacle. Cassidy 2 Decl. (ECF 17-1) ¶ 5, Ex. 1 (Agreement). The Agreement states that job applicants who wish to 3 be considered for employment at Pinnacle must read and sign the Agreement requiring arbitration 4 of any legal dispute.2 Id. at 5 (emphasis in original) (“If you wish to be considered for 5 employment you must read and sign the following Issue Resolution Agreement. This 6 Agreement requires you to arbitrate any legal dispute related to your application for 7 employment,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.