Singh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YOGENDRA SINGH, et al., Case Nos. 23-cv-06702-VC Plaintiffs, 24-cv-00137-VC 24-cv-00229-VC v.

GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

DISMISS

Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 10, 10, 12

JANNA LYNN NIEUWBOER,

Plaintiff, v.

GENERAL MOTORS LLC,

Defendant.

GILBERT JOSEPH JACKSON,

Plaintiffs, v.

GENERAL MOTORS LLC,

Defendant.

The defendant’s motions to dismiss the plaintiff’s fraud and UCL claims in these three cases is granted. This order assumes the reader’s familiarity with the facts of the cases, the relevant law, and the parties’ arguments. The plaintiffs have failed to plead their fraud claims, including their claims under the fraudulent prong of the UCL, with particularity as required under Rule 9(b). See Vess v. Ciba- Geigy Corp. USA, 317 F.3d 1097, 1103-04 (9th Cir. 2003). The complaints do not say specifically what misleading advertisements or statements the plaintiffs saw or relied upon. Instead, the complaints contain only general allegations that GM marketed the Bolt as a long range, safe, and affordable vehicle. The complaints also do not offer more than general…