Pardi
Pardi v. Tricida, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL PARDI, et al., Case No. 21-cv-00076-HSG
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
SEAL
TRICIDA, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 139 Defendants.
12 Pending before the Court is Defendant Gerrit Klaerner (“Klaerner”)’s motion to seal related to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) and the briefing for Klaerner’s motion to dismiss. See Dkt. No. 139. Interested non-party Renibus Therapeutics, Inc. (“Renibus”) filed a statement in support of Klaerner’s motion to seal, seeking to maintain under seal a small portion of the information identified by Klaerner in his sealing request. See Dkt. No. 140. For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion to seal as to the narrower set of information identified by Renibus, and DENIES the motion to seal as to the remainder of the information identified by Klaerner. I. LEGAL STANDARD Courts generally apply a “compelling reasons” standard when…