Bregan
Bregan v. The John Stuart Company
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 JAMES BREGAN, et al., Case No. 23-cv-01823-LB
12 Plaintiffs,
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN
13 v. PART AND DENYING IN PART
MOTIONS TO DISMISS
14 THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 15, 17 15 Defendants. 16 17 INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT 18 The plaintiffs rented a home in the Presidio of San Francisco, a federal enclave administered 19 by the Presidio Trust. In June 2021, the defendants allegedly performed a roof replacement 20 without proper precautions, resulting in lead contamination from the home’s lead paint, and then 21 failed to properly remediate the contamination. The Bregan plaintiffs’ young child tested positive 22 for high lead levels in her blood.1 23 The plaintiffs sued five defendants: Enterprise Roofing Service (the company that contracted 24 with the Presidio Trust to perform the roof work) and a group of “landlord defendants” consisting 25 of the Trust (the landlord…