Ward

Ward v. Stanislaus

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20243:23-cv-06167California2,743 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARC R WARD, Case No. 23-cv-06167-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT COOPER’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

JIM COOPER, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 11 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Ward, who represents himself, sues Sacramento County Sheriff Jim Cooper in his official capacity for serving a court-ordered writ of garnishment. (Dkt. No. 5 at 4-5.) Before the Court is Defendant Cooper’s motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 11.) Having carefully considered the briefing and with the benefit of oral argument on February 15, 2024, the Court GRANTS Defendant Cooper’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiff Ward’s § 1983 claim against Defendant Cooper in his official capacity is barred by the Eleventh Amendment and fails to state a claim for relief. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Ward is employed by Wells Fargo. (Dkt. No. 5 at 5.) The Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office’s Civil Bureau, which operates under the authority of Sheriff Jim…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.