Rivas

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

9

10 PRISCILLA R., 11 Plaintiff, No. C 23-03324 WHA

12 v.

13 MARTIN O’MALLEY, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT

14 SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,1 15 Defendant.

16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 In this social security action, prior orders granted defendant’s motion to dismiss, denied 19 plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend, and entered judgment (Dkt. Nos. 17, 22, 23). Plaintiff 20 now moves for relief from the judgment under Rules 59(e) and 60. For the reasons stated 21 herein, plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. 22 STATEMENT 23 Because the instant motion faults the district court for failing to consider the relevant 24 facts, some factual background at the outset is warranted. 25 Plaintiff began receiving social security disability benefits in 1996 (First Amd. Compl. 26 ¶ 10). In June 2021, the Social Security Administration sent her a notice letter informing her 27 1 that it…