Quinto-Collins

Quinto-Collins v. City of Antioch

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20243:21-cv-06094California11,067 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARIA CASSANDRA QUINTO- Case No. 21-cv-06094-AMO COLLINS, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY 10 JUDGMENT; DENYING IN PART CITY OF ANTIOCH, et al., PLAINTIFFS’ CROSS-MOTION FOR 11 PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants. 12 Re: Dkt. No. 62, 66

13 14 This case arises out of the December 2020 death of Angelo Quinto following a 911 15 response from City of Antioch Police Officers James Perkinson, Arturo Becerra, Daniel Hopwood, 16 and Nicholas Shipilov. Plaintiffs Maria Cassandra Quinto-Collins, as successor-in-interest to her 17 son, Angelo, and Isabella Collins, Angelo’s sister, filed a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983, asserting federal constitutional claims and related state law claims against the City of 19 Antioch, Chief of Police Tammany Brooks, and Officers Perkinson,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.