Kuster

Lynch v. Kuster

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 20244:21-cv-09897California4,328 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ANTWYONE LYNCH, Case No. 21-cv-09897-JSW

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

9 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT; REFERRING

CASE TO PRISONER MEDIATION

10 A. KUSTER, et al., PROGRAM; STAYING CASE Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 18 11

12 INTRODUCTION 13 Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action under 42 14 U.S.C. § 1983 against officials at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”). The remaining claims are 15 First Amendment retaliation claims against Defendants Martinez and Marquez, and Eighth 16 Amendment endangerment claims against Defendants Kregg and Paulson.1 These Defendants 17 (hereinafter “Defendants” unless otherwise specified) filed a motion for summary judgment. 18 Plaintiff opposed the motion, and Defendants replied. For the reasons discussed below, the 19 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 20 BACKGROUND 21 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.