Davis

Davis v. Suhr

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20193:16-cv-04487California1,367 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JOHN L. DAVIS, Case No.16-cv-04487-JD

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v. 9 Re: Dkt. Nos. 35, 36, 37 10 GREG SUHR, et al., Defendants. 11

12 13 Plaintiff, a prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This 14 action was stayed pending the outcome of plaintiff’s criminal proceeding. The stay was lifted, and 15 the second amended complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff has submitted a 16 filing (Docket No. 33) that the Court construes as a third amended complaint. Plaintiff has also 17 filed several motions for injunctive relief. 18 DISCUSSION 19 STANDARD OF REVIEW 20 Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek 21 redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 22 § 1915A(a). In its review, the Court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims 23 which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.