Davenport

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CARLTON DAVENPORT, et al., Case No. 23-cv-01877-PCP

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

9 v. COMPEL ARBITRATION

10 NVIDIA CORPORATION, Defendant. 11

12 Defendant Nvidia Corporation asserts that plaintiffs in this putative consumer class action 13 agreed to arbitrate their claims. For the reasons that follow, the Court concludes that plaintiffs’ 14 claims are covered by an enforceable arbitration agreement. Nvidia’s motion to compel arbitration 15 is therefore granted. 16 I. Background 17 According to the complaint in this putative class action, Nvidia sold a “Shield” line of 18 devices with a feature that allowed owners to stream games from a computer to a TV at 60 frames 19 per second in 4K resolution. Plaintiffs claim that Nvidia advertised, marketed, and sold Shield 20 devices as including the game streaming feature, but then subsequently disabled access to this 21 feature. They assert that this deprived them of a feature they had paid for and devalued their 22 …