McKnight

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KAREIM MCKNIGHT, Case No. 22-cv-04600-WHO

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

9 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

DISMISS

10 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 58 11 Defendants.

12 Defendants employed by the City and County of San Francisco detained, arrested, and 13 injected plaintiff Kareim McKnight with a sedative following McKnight’s participation in a group 14 protest at the Chase Center in San Francisco during a Golden State Warriors game. McKnight 15 sued. Following a prior motion to dismiss that was granted in part and denied in part and the 16 filing of McKnight’s Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”), defendants again move to dismiss. On 17 this motion defendants argue that: (1) McKnight has still not alleged any claims against San 18 Francisco Police Department (“SFPD”) Captain Amy Hurwitz; (2) she fails to state a claim of 19 false imprisonment; (3) her Ralph Civil Rights Act claim remains deficient; and (4) she was not 20 given leave to add two new…