Turner

Turner v. Mercury Group Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20243:23-cv-05553California1,251 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TERRANCE TURNER, Case No. 4:23-cv-05553-KAW

8 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 9 v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 1, 2

10 MERCURY GROUP CORPORATION, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 On October 27, 2023, Plaintiff Terrance Turner proceeding pro se, filed a complaint and an 14 application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Dkt. Nos. 1 & 2.) Having reviewed Plaintiff’s 15 complaint and application, the Court issues the following order to show cause. 16 A. Real Party in Interest and Standing 17 As an initial matter, the allegations in the complaint do not appear to be about Plaintiff. 18 Instead, he alleges he “is an affiliate of USSOCOM and The Federal Bureau of Investigations. 19 Federal Bar Appointee, INTERPOL SEC 431170989,” and “is charged with filing lawsuits during 20 the natural course of business and life restitution activities beyond personal whim, beyond 21 personal will, is the subject of monitory per CIA AND USSOCOM directive and military 22 intelligence…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.