Rangel

Rangel v. Williams

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20243:21-cv-00278California814 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 JONATHAN RANGEL, Case No. 21-cv-00278-JSC

10 Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT

11 v. PREJUDICE

12 V. WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants. 13

14 Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding without an attorney, filed this civil rights action 15 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. As explained in the order to show cause dated January 17, 2024:

16 On October 17, 2023, the most recent order was mailed to [Plaintiff] with the prisoner number and address he provided to the Court on 17 July 5, 2023.1 (ECF Nos. 81, 82, 83.) On October 26, 2023, the order was returned by the postal service because the mail could not 18 be delivered to him at the address and with the number he provided. (ECF No. 84.) Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to Defendants’ 19 motion for summary judgment despite having requested, and received, an extension of time to do so (ECF No. 83); nor has he 20 made contact with the Court in more than six months. 21 (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.