Connolly

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 LEVI STRAUSS & CO., Case No. 22-cv-04106-VKD

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

10 v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

11 DAVID CONNOLLY, JUDGMENT 12 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 51

13 14 Plaintiff Levi Strauss & Co. (“LS&Co.”) filed this action against defendant David 15 Connolly, asserting federal and California law claims for trademark infringement, trademark 16 dilution, and unfair competition.1 See Dkt. No. 1. LS&Co. now moves for summary judgment on 17 its federal infringement, unfair competition, and dilution claims.2 See Dkt. No. 51. At the motion 18 hearing, LS&Co. reiterated that it is prepared to waive its damages claims, and further clarified 19 that it is seeking summary judgment on liability issues, and that it intends to seek injunctive relief 20 only. See Dkt. No. 60. Mr. Connolly opposes the motion. See Dkt. Nos. 52, 53. Upon 21 consideration of…