Connolly

Levi Strauss & Co. v. Connolly

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20245:22-cv-04106California6,249 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 LEVI STRAUSS & CO., Case No. 22-cv-04106-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

DAVID CONNOLLY, JUDGMENT Defendant. Re: Dkt. No.

13 Plaintiff Levi Strauss & Co. (“LS&Co.”) filed this action against defendant David Connolly, asserting federal and California law claims for trademark infringement, trademark dilution, and unfair competition. See Dkt. No. 1. LS&Co. now moves for summary judgment on its federal infringement, unfair competition, and dilution claims. See Dkt. No. 51. At the motion hearing, LS&Co. reiterated that it is prepared to waive its damages claims, and further clarified that it is seeking summary judgment on liability issues, and that it intends to seek injunctive relief only. See Dkt. No. 60. Mr. Connolly opposes the motion. See Dkt. Nos. 52, 53. Upon consideration of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.