Brown
Brown v. O'Malley
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 8 D.B.,1 Case No. 24-cv-00295-PHK 9 Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MANDATORY
10 v. SCREENING OF COMPLAINT
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.
11 MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, § 1915(e)(2)(B) 12 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 1
13 14 Plaintiff D.B. (“Plaintiff”) brings this action under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 15 § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security 16 Administration, Defendant Martin O’Malley (“Commissioner”), denying Plaintiff’s application for 17 supplemental security income. [Dkt. 1]. The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s application to 18 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). [Dkt. 5]. The Court 19 now undertakes a determination of whether Plaintiff’s Complaint must be dismissed pursuant to 20 the requirements of § 1915(e)(2)(B). 21 Any complaint filed pursuant to the IFP provisions of § 1915(a) is subject to mandatory…