Delgado

Delgado v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20243:23-cv-04181California6,384 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 NATALIE DELGADO, Case No. 23-cv-04181-SI

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

9 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

DISMISS

10 META PLATFORMS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 35 11 Defendant.

12 13 Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Meta”) moves to dismiss the putative class action 14 complaint in this case. The matter came on for hearing on February 23, 2024. For the reasons set 15 forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion to dismiss. 16 17 BACKGROUND 18 “Illinois’s Biometric Information Privacy Act, familiarly known as BIPA, provides robust 19 protections for the biometric information of Illinois residents. See 740 ILCS 14/1 et seq. It does so 20 by regulating the collection, retention, disclosure, and destruction of biometric identifiers or 21 information—for example, retinal scans, fingerprints, or facial geometry.” Thornley v. Clearview 22 AI, Inc., 984 F.3d 1241, 1242 (7th Cir. 2021). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.