Munoz

Munoz v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20243:20-cv-04954California887 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 YOLANDA MUNOZ, Case No. 3:20-cv-04954-LB

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

13 v. COUNSEL’S MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY’S FEES

14 ANDREW M. SAUL, Re: ECF No. 28 15 Defendant. 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 In this Social Security appeal, the parties stipulated to, and the court approved, voluntary 19 remand for further agency proceedings.1 On remand, the plaintiff received past-due disability 20 benefits.2 The parties previously stipulated that the plaintiff be awarded attorney fees in the 21 amount of $4,000.00 under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).3 The 22 plaintiff’s counsel now seeks fees of $36,000.00, which is within the 25-percent limit allowed 23 24 25

26 1 Order – ECF No. 23. Citations refer to material in the Electronic Case File (“ECF”); pinpoint citations are to the ECF-generated page numbers at the top of documents. 27 2 Notice of Benefits – ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.