In re HIV Antitrust Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20243:19-cv-02573California1,623 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 IN RE HIV ANTITRUST LITIGATION. Case No. 19-cv-02573-EMC

8

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

9 MOTION TO FILE CERTAIN

DEMONSTRATIVES

10 11 Docket No. 2155

12 13 14 The Court has entered a final judgment with respect to the reverse payment and TAF 15 claims. Now pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’1 motion for permission to file certain 16 demonstratives that were used during the trial on the reverse payment claims so that they will be 17 part of the record on appeal to the Ninth Circuit. The demonstratives at issue (nine total) are ones 18 used during the testimonies of Dr. McGuire (Plaintiffs’ expert) and Dr. Wu (Defendants’ expert). 19 Having considered the parties’ briefs and accompanying submissions, other evidence of record, 20 and the oral argument of counsel and other evidence of record, the Court hereby GRANTS 21 Plaintiffs’ motion. 22 Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 10 provides that a district court has the authority to 23 address certain issues…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.