Serrato

Serrato v. Blazin Wings, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20245:22-cv-04889California175 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 ANGELINA SERRATO, Case NO: 5:22-cv-04889 NC 9 Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL 10 y DISMISSAL 11 Dkt. No. 31 19 BLAZIN WINGS, INC., Defendant. 13

15 The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that

GQ 16 || no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this

5 17 || action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the

18 || Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the 19 || case, provided that such motion is filed within 30 days. All scheduled dates are 20 || VACATED. 21 The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 30 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian 22 || Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: March 1, 2024 h-_———— _

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.