Resh, Inc v. Skimlite Manufacturing Inc

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 RESH, INC, Case No. 22-cv-01427-EJD (VKD)

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

10 v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

SEAL

11 BARRETT CONRAD, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 98, 101 Defendants. 12

13 14 Plaintiff Resh, Inc. (“Resh”) asks the Court to seal portions of the deposition transcript of 15 Eric Resh, its named investor, in this patent case regarding telescoping pools for cleaning pools. 16 Dkt. Nos. 101. The Court previously denied an earlier request to seal these materials because 17 Resh failed to file a timely statement or declaration in support of sealing. See Dkt. No. 97 at 1 n.1. 18 Resh has now filed a statement in support of its sealing request (Dkt. No. 98) and a revised set of 19 redactions (Dkt. No. 101-2). 20 There is a strong presumption in favor of access by the public to judicial records and 21 documents accompanying dispositive motions that can be overcome only by a showing of 22 “compelling reasons…