Carter

PMI Waterford Park, LLC v. Carter

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20244:24-cv-00081California951 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PMI WATERFORD PARK, LLC, Case No. 24-cv-00081-HSG

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO REMAND AND

9 v. TERMINATING AS MOOT

DEFENDANTS’ IN FORMA PAUPERIS

10 TOMMY CARTER, et al., APPLICATION 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 2, 13

12 13 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to remand, Dkt. No. 13, and Defendants’ in 14 forma pauperis application, Dkt. No. 2. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition 15 without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons 16 detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion to remand, and TERMINATES as moot 17 Defendants’ application. 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 Plaintiff PMI Waterford Park, LLC filed an unlawful detainer (“UD”) action against 20 Defendants Tommy Carter and Lisa Willis on November 3, 2023 in Santa Clara County Superior 21 Court. Dkt. No. 1-1. On January 4, 2024, Defendants, who are proceeding pro se, removed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.