Dyer
Dyer v. DOES 1-10
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6
MIN JI GOO DYER,
7 Case No. 23-cv-01226-JCS Plaintiff, 8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY v. GOOGLE SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN 9 CONTEMPT FOR FAILURE TO
JOHN DOES 1-10, COMPLY WITH SUBPOENA AND
10 CONTINUING MARCH 8, 2024 CASE Defendant. MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO 11
MARCH 22, 2024
12 13
14 15 Plaintiff has filed two motions under Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to 16 hold non-party Google Inc. in contempt for failure to comply with a subpoena issued by this Court 17 and compel compliance. See docket nos. 34, 35. The Court construes Plaintiff’s motions as an 18 application for an order to show cause (“Application”) and GRANTS the Application. Martinez v. 19 City of Pittsburg, 2012 WL 699462, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2012). (“[W]hen a non-party does 20 not comply with a subpoena . . . , the most appropriate procedural step is to file an application…