Dyer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIN JI GOO DYER,

Case No. 23-cv-01226-JCS Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY v. GOOGLE SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT FOR FAILURE TO

JOHN DOES 1-10, COMPLY WITH SUBPOENA AND

CONTINUING MARCH 8, 2024 CASE Defendant. MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO

MARCH 22, 2024

12

14 Plaintiff has filed two motions under Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to hold non-party Google Inc. in contempt for failure to comply with a subpoena issued by this Court and compel compliance. See docket nos. 34, 35. The Court construes Plaintiff’s motions as an application for an order to show cause (“Application”) and GRANTS the Application. Martinez v. City of Pittsburg, 2012 WL 699462, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2012). (“[W]hen a non-party does not comply with a subpoena . . . , the most appropriate procedural step is to file an application…