Flores

Smith v. Flores

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20243:23-cv-00132California3,319 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JEFFERY THOMAS SMITH, Case No. 23-cv-00132-AMO

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

9 v. DISMISS

10 JACQUELINE FLORES, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 10 Defendants. 11

12 13 Before the Court is Defendants County of Napa and Jacqueline Flores’s motion to dismiss. 14 The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7-6. 15 Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal 16 authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion to dismiss, for the 17 following reasons. 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 This case challenges the mask mandate at a Napa public library. On January 11, 2022, 20 Plaintiff Jeffery Thomas Smith, pro se, used the Napa County Library in Calistoga, California, 21 without a face mask. First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (ECF 4) ¶¶ 11, 15.1 Smith cannot read a 22 computer screen or book without using reading glasses, and using a face mask fogs the reading 23 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.