Ahmed
Ahmed v. Jaddou
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BASSAM AHMED MOHAMED AHMED, Case No. 23-cv-04259-SI
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
9 v. PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS
PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED
10 UR M. JADDOU, et al., COMPLAINT 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 20
12 13 Defendants’ partial motion to dismiss is scheduled for a hearing on March 8, 2024. Pursuant 14 to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines that the matter is appropriate for resolution without 15 oral argument and VACATES the hearing. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the 16 motion. 17 18
BACKGROUND1
19 Plaintiff Bassam Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed brings this civil action against defendants Ur 20 Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”), 21 Antony Blinken, and United States Department of State (“DOS”), seeking a declaration of United 22 States citizenship and issuance of a United States passport. First Amended Compl. (“FAC”) (Dkt. 23 No. 17). 24 …