Resh, Inc v. Skimlite Manufacturing Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20245:22-cv-01427California760 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 RESH, INC, Case No. 22-cv-01427-EJD (VKD)

9 Plaintiff,

INTERIM ORDER RE FEBRUARY 28,

10 v. 2024 DISCOVERY DISPUTE

11 BARRETT CONRAD, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 100 Defendants. 12

13 14 Plaintiff Resh, Inc. (“Resh”) and defendants Robert Conrad, Inc. (“Skimlite”), Barrett 15 Conrad, and James Conrad ask the Court to determine whether Resh may withhold “MS Paint 16 drawings” made by its named inventor, Eric Resh, on the basis of attorney-client privilege and/or 17 the attorney work-product doctrine. See Dkt. No. 100. The Court recently resolved a similar 18 dispute regarding Resh’s invocation of attorney-client privilege during Mr. Resh’s deposition (the 19 “deposition dispute”). Dkt. No. 97. The Court finds this dispute suitable for resolution without 20 oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). 21 The document or documents in dispute are identified as “Document 10209” in Resh’s 22 privilege log. See Dkt. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.