Prasad
Prasad v. County of San Mateo
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KEVIN B. PRASAD, Case No. 22-cv-02720-JST
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT
9 v. REQUEST TO PAUSE LITIGATION;
DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE
10 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, et al., LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED
COMPLAINT; DENYING REQUESTS
11 Defendants. FOR LEAVE TO FILE ADDITIONAL
RESPONSES TO SUMMARY
12 JUDGMENT MOTION; GRANTING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
13 SUMMARY JUDGMENT; SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
14 Re: ECF Nos. 16, 18, 40, 41, 49 15 16 Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee in the custody of San Mateo County, filed a pro se complaint 17 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that defendant San Mateo County has a policy of feeding Plaintiff 18 gravy made from pork products despite knowing that pork consumption violates the dictates of 19 Plaintiff’s religion. ECF No. 1, 10. This order addresses the following pending motions: (1) 20 Plaintiff’s request to pause the litigation, ECF No. 18; (2) defendant…