Prasad

Prasad v. County of San Mateo

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20244:22-cv-02720California5,722 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KEVIN B. PRASAD, Case No. 22-cv-02720-JST

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT

9 v. REQUEST TO PAUSE LITIGATION;

DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE

10 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, et al., LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED

COMPLAINT; DENYING REQUESTS

11 Defendants. FOR LEAVE TO FILE ADDITIONAL

RESPONSES TO SUMMARY

12 JUDGMENT MOTION; GRANTING

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

13 SUMMARY JUDGMENT; SETTING

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

14 Re: ECF Nos. 16, 18, 40, 41, 49 15 16 Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee in the custody of San Mateo County, filed a pro se complaint 17 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that defendant San Mateo County has a policy of feeding Plaintiff 18 gravy made from pork products despite knowing that pork consumption violates the dictates of 19 Plaintiff’s religion. ECF No. 1, 10. This order addresses the following pending motions: (1) 20 Plaintiff’s request to pause the litigation, ECF No. 18; (2) defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.