Prasad

Prasad v. County of San Mateo

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20244:22-cv-02720California5,722 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KEVIN B. PRASAD, Case No. 22-cv-02720-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT

v. REQUEST TO PAUSE LITIGATION;

DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, et al., LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED

COMPLAINT; DENYING REQUESTS

Defendants. FOR LEAVE TO FILE ADDITIONAL

RESPONSES TO SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION; GRANTING

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT; SETTING

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

14 Re: ECF Nos. 16, 18, 40, 41, 49 15 Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee in the custody of San Mateo County, filed a pro se complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that defendant San Mateo County has a policy of feeding Plaintiff gravy made from pork products despite knowing that pork consumption violates the dictates of Plaintiff’s religion. ECF No. 1, 10. This order addresses the following pending motions: (1) Plaintiff’s request to pause the litigation, ECF No. 18; (2) defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.