Prasad
Prasad v. County of San Mateo
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20244:22-cv-02720California5,722 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KEVIN B. PRASAD, Case No. 22-cv-02720-JST
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT
v. REQUEST TO PAUSE LITIGATION;
DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, et al., LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED
COMPLAINT; DENYING REQUESTS
Defendants. FOR LEAVE TO FILE ADDITIONAL
RESPONSES TO SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION; GRANTING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT; SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
14 Re: ECF Nos. 16, 18, 40, 41, 49 15 Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee in the custody of San Mateo County, filed a pro se complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that defendant San Mateo County has a policy of feeding Plaintiff gravy made from pork products despite knowing that pork consumption violates the dictates of Plaintiff’s religion. ECF No. 1, 10. This order addresses the following pending motions: (1) Plaintiff’s request to pause the litigation, ECF No. 18; (2) defendant…